# Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wednesday, 23 Jan 2008.
Didn't this one date back to an 80's attempt to have builders pay for public art?
Speculators could gain an extra floor or two on a building by allocating a % of costs to art - a policy that seems to have been quietly dropped once they found they could get away with just buying one expensive ugly object like this, or the Henry Moore in the Botanic Gardens.
Didn't this one date back to an 80's attempt to have builders pay for public art?
Speculators could gain an extra floor or two on a building by allocating a % of costs to art - a policy that seems to have been quietly dropped once they found they could get away with just buying one expensive ugly object like this, or the Henry Moore in the Botanic Gardens.