It would be postnominal (after the name) not pronominal (relating to a pronoun). I'd maybe call it a social postnominal suffix, but you could argue that the III (or whatever) is part of the name, so maybe just a social suffix.
Actually, if it were up to me to define it, I'd call it an ego sequel.
It would be postnominal (after the name) not pronominal (relating to a pronoun). I'd maybe call it a social postnominal suffix, but you could argue that the III (or whatever) is part of the name, so maybe just a social suffix.
Actually, if it were up to me to define it, I'd call it an ego sequel.
</nerd>